Page 44 - Craniomaxillofacial Implant Surgery - Jeroen P.J. Dings

42
Chapter 2
20. Chen H, van Eijnatten M, Aarab G, Forouzanfar T, de Lange J, van der Stelt P, et al. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT
in three-dimensional evaluation of the oropharynx morphology. Eur J Orthod 2018; 40: 58-64
21. Liang X, Lambrichts I, Sun Y, Denis K, Hassan B, Li L, et al. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed
Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 270-274
22. Lund H, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Accuracy and precision of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography Accuitomo tomograms obtained with different reconstruction techniques. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 379-386
23. Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: e1-7
24. Loubele M, Van Assche N, Carpentier K, Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, et al. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 512-518
25. Widmann G, Zangerl A, Schullian P, Fasser M, Puelacher W, Bale R. Do image modality and registration method influence the accuracy of craniofacial navigation? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: 2165-2173
26. Freire-Maia B, Machado VD, Valerio CS, Custodio AL, Manzi FR, Junqueira JL. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on multi-slice and cone beam computed tomography scans to detect the mandibular canal during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46: 296-302
27. Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 19-25
28. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 387-395
29. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 80-93
30. Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 534-542
31. Panmekiate S, Apinhasmit W, Petersson A. Effect of electric potential and current on mandibular linear measurements in cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 578-582
32. Oliveira ML, Tosoni GM, Lindsey DH, Mendoza K, Tetradis S, Mallya SM. Influence of anatomical location on CT numbers in cone beam computed tomography. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology 2013; 115: 558-564
33. Yamashina A, Tanimoto K, Sutthiprapaporn P, Hayakawa Y. The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of the oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 245-251
34. Chen H, van Eijnatten M, Wolff J, de Lange J, van der Stelt PF, Lobbezoo F, et al. Reliability and accuracy of three imaging software packages used for 3D analysis of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 46: 20170043
35. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 265- 269
36. Dillenseger JP, Matern JF, Gros CI, Bornert F, Goetz C, Le Minor JM, et al. MSCT versus CBCT: evaluation of high- resolution acquisition modes for dento-maxillary and skull-base imaging. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 505-515
37. Gomes LR, Gomes MR, Goncalves JR, Ruellas AC, Wolford LM, Paniagua B, et al. Cone beam computed tomography-based models versus multislice spiral computed tomography-based models for assessing condylar morphology. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology 2016; 121: 96-105
38. Patcas R, Markic G, Muller L, Ullrich O, Peltomaki T, Kellenberger CJ, et al. Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: a tale of two CTs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 637-644
39. Maret D, Telmon N, Peters OA, Lepage B, Treil J, Inglese JM, et al. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 649-655
40. Widmann G, Fischer B, Berggren JP, Dennhardt A, Schullian P, Reto B, et al. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016; 31: 527-533