Page 137 - Craniomaxillofacial Implant Surgery - Jeroen P.J. Dings

General discussion and future perspectives
REFERENCES
1. Matta, R.E., et al., The impact of different cone beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scan parameters on virtual three-dimensional model accuracy using a highly precise ex vivo evaluation method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44: 632-6
2. Wismeijer, D., et al., Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 436- 442
3. Fokas, G., et al., Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 393-415
4. Al-Ekrish, A.A. and M. Ekram, A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 67-75
5. Freire-Maia, B., et al., Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on multi-slice and cone beam computed tomography scans to detect the mandibular canal during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46; 296-302
6. Pena de Andrade, J.G., et al., Comparison of 64-Detector-Multislice and Cone Beam Computed Tomographies in the Evaluation of Linear Measurements in the Alveolar Ridge. Int J Prosthodont 2016; 29: 132-4
7. Loubele, M., et al., Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 512-8
8. Gerlach, N.L., et al., Accuracy of bone surface size and cortical layer thickness measurements using cone beam computerized tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 793-7
9. Ganguly, R., et al., Accuracy of linear measurement in the Galileos cone beam computed tomography under simulated clinical conditions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 299-305
10. Wood, R., et al., Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone- beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 353-63
11. Kamiyama, Y., et al., Linear measurement accuracy of dental CT images obtained by 64-slice multidetector row CT: the effects of mandibular positioning and pitch factor at CT scanning. Implant Dent 2012; 21: 496-501
12. Mischkowski, R.A., et al., Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 551-9
13. Sabban, H., et al., Evaluation of linear measurements of implant sites based on head orientation during acquisition: An ex vivo study using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2015; 45: 73-80
14. Fernandes, T.M., et al., Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci 2015; 23: 56-63
15. Tolentino, E.S., et al., Reliability and accuracy of linear measurements in cone-beam computed tomography 7 using different software programs and voxel sizes. J Conserv Dent 2018; 21: 607-612
16. Goh, B.T. and K.H. Teoh, Orbital implant placement using a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) stereolithographic surgical template protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44: 642-8
17. Huang, Y.H., et al., Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report. Int Med Case Rep J 2016; 9: 341-345
18. Choi, K.J., et al., Image-Guided Placement of Osseointegrated Implants for Challenging Auricular, Orbital, and Rhinectomy Defects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2016; 125: 801-7
19. Raico Gallardo, Y.N., et al., Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 602-612
20. Verma, S., et al., Virtual Preoperative Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Facial Prosthetic Reconstruction: A Technical Note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017; 32: e77-e81
21. Verhamme, L.M., et al., A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17: 343-52
22. Van Assche, N., et al., Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 112-23
23. Behneke, A., et al., Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography-derived laboratory-based
surgical templates on partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012. 23: 137-43
24. Soares, M.M., et al., An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 824-31
135