Page 117 - Craniomaxillofacial Implant Surgery - Jeroen P.J. Dings

Autologous versus prosthetic nasal and auricular reconstruction
REFERENCES
1. Wagenblast J, Baghi M, Helbig M, Arnoldner C, Bisdas S, Gstottner W, et al. Craniofacial reconstructions with bone-anchored epithesis in head and neck cancer patients--a valid way back to self-perception and social reintegration. Anticancer Res 2008;28:2349-52
2. Chang TL, Garrett N, Roumanas E, Beumer J, 3rd. Treatment satisfaction with facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:275-80
3. Magritz R, Siegert R. Auricular reconstruction: surgical innovations, training methods, and an attempt for a look forward. Facial Plast Surg 2014;30:183-93
4. Wilkes GH, Wong J, Guilfoyle R. Microtia reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:464-79
5. Lunenburger H, Roknic N, Klein M, Wermker K. Treatment Outcome of the Transfacial Titanium Epiplating
System for Total Nasal Defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:405-13
6. Tjellstrom A, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Albrektsson T, Branemark PI. Osseointegrated titanium implants in the
temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 1981;2:304-10
7. Vijverberg MA, Verhamme L, van de Pol P, Kunst HPM, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS. Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;276:1017-27
8. van den Elzen ME, Versnel SL, Hovius SE, Passchier J, Duivenvoorden HJ, Mathijssen IM. Adults with congenital or acquired facial disfigurement: impact of appearance on social functioning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:777-82
9. Kievit H, Verhage-Damen GW, Ingels KJ, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Long-term quality of life assessment in patients with auricular prostheses. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:392-7
10. Moolenburgh SE, Mureau MA, Hofer SO. Aesthetic outcome after nasal reconstruction: patient versus panel perception. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1459-64
11. Mureau MA, Moolenburgh SE, Levendag PC, Hofer SO. Aesthetic and functional outcome following nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1217-27; discussion 28-30
12. Moolenburgh SE, Mureau MA, Hofer SO. Facial attractiveness and abnormality of nasal reconstruction patients and controls assessed by laypersons. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:676-80
13. Arden RL, Nawroz-Danish M, Yoo GH, Meleca RJ, Burgio DL. Nasal alar reconstruction: a critical analysis 6 using melolabial island and paramedian forehead flaps. Laryngoscope 1999;109:376-82
14. Quatela VC, Sherris DA, Rounds MF. Esthetic refinements in forehead flap nasal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:1106-13
15. Younis I, Gault D, Sabbagh W, Kang NV. Patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes after ear reconstruction with a Branemark-type, bone-anchored, ear prosthesis: a 16 year review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1650-5
16. Dey JK, Ishii M, Boahene KD, Byrne P, Ishii LE. Impact of facial defect reconstruction on attractiveness and negative facial perception. Laryngoscope 2015;125:1316-21
17. Phillis M, Ishii M, Dey J, Goines J, Byrne PJ, Boahene KD, et al. Measurement of the Quality of Facial Lesion Reconstruction With Observer-Graded Affect Display. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016;18:467-73
18. Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:469-80; discussion 81-2
19. Donders AR, van der Heijden GJ, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1087-91
20. Alsarraf R. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000;24:192-7
21. Voutilainen A, Pitkaaho T, Kvist T, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. How to ask about patient satisfaction? The visual analogue scale is less vulnerable to confounding factors and ceiling effect than a symmetric Likert scale. J Adv Nurs 2016;72:946-57
22. Gkantidis N, Papamanou DA, Christou P, Topouzelis N. Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013;41:e105-10
115