Page 112 - Craniomaxillofacial Implant Surgery - Jeroen P.J. Dings

Chapter 6
110
Table 7 Satisfaction with the appearance of reconstructed auricular subunits (five-point Likert scale).
Auricular Layman Patient OMF-surgeon ENT-surgeon
reconstruction
Anatomical Prosthesis Autologous Control Prosthesis Autologous Control Prosthesis Autologous Control Prosthesis Autologous Control
subunits reconstruction
reconstruction
reconstruction
reconstruction
Helix 4.02
2.66 4.24 4.12
3.50 4.18 4.20
2.70 4.34 4.46 2.20 4.03 4.15 2.03 3.95 4.11 2.13 4.09 3.47 1.57 4.25 3.91 1.73 4.14 3.76 1.55 4.15 3.64 1.73 4.04 3.88 2.22 4.14 3.80
3.67 4.38 3.03 4.23
Antihelix 3.61
P = <0.01
2.22 4.03 3.92
P = <0.01
2.92 3.96 3.81
P = <0.01 P = <0.01 P = <0.01 P = <0.01 P = <0.01 P = <0.01 P = <0.01 P = <0.01 P = <0.01
P = <0.01 P = <0.01
Scapha 3.63
P = <0.01
2.14 4.07 3.86
P = <0.01
2.83 3.95 3.84
3.03 4.16
Triangular 3.51 fossa
P = <0.01
1.55 4.28 3.72
P = <0.01
2.10 4.09 3.60
P = 0.12
3.18 4.05 2.37 4.42
Concha 3.51 Cymba 3.32 Tragus 3.15
P = <0.01
1.70 4.18 3.62
P = <0.01
2.13 3.92 3.53
P = <0.01
2.58 4.37
Anti-tragus 3.19 Lobulus 3.42
P = <0.01 P = <0.01
1.51 3.98 3.64
P = <0.01
2.05 3.64 3.68
P-value difference prosthesis versus autologous reconstruction
P-value difference prosthesis versus autologous reconstruction
P-value difference prosthesis versus autologous reconstruction
P-value difference prosthesis versus autologous reconstruction
P = <0.01
2.21 4.21 3.93
P = <0.01
2.73 4.09 3.71
P = <0.01
P = <0.01
1.46 4.16 3.40
P = <0.01
2.12 4.02 3.52
P = <0.01 P = <0.01 P = <0.01 P = 0.03
2.35 4.54 2.23 4.34 3.23 4.38
P = <0.01
Mean score and P-value based on the mixed-model analyses (P < .05).
2.31 4.08 3.78
3.17 3.81 3.78
P = <0.01
P = 0.02