Page 109 - Craniomaxillofacial Implant Surgery - Jeroen P.J. Dings
P. 109
Autologous versus prosthetic nasal and auricular reconstruction
6
107
Difference* P-value Difference* P-value Difference* P-value Difference* P-value Difference* P-value Difference* P-value Difference* P-value Difference* P-value
Table 5 Difference between the perceptions of prosthetic and autologous reconstructions for nasal and auricular defects (95% confidence interval), calculated using a mixed model.
Matches patient’s face (0–100)
1.76 (–7.35 – 10.88)
–0.05 (–7.03 – 6.93)
<0.01
13.57 0.01 2.99 0.47 –2.88 0.59
–4.28 0.23 (–11.26 –
Natural shape (0–100)
22.21 (13.57– 30.84)
<0.01 0.11 0.05 0.26
6.32 (–0.29 – 12.93)
0.06 0.55 0.96 0.83
13.68 (4.18 – 23.18)
0.01 0.44 0.38 0.73
6.97 (–0.31 – 14.24)
0.06 0.27 0.39 0.10
29.37 (19.88 – 38.87)
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
15.16 (7.89 – 22.43)
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
10.15 (0.65 – 19.65)
0.04 0.18 0.19 0.96
0.37 0.92 (–6.90 –
Position on the face
(1–5)
0.27 (–0.06 – 0.61)
0.08 (–0.19 – 0.35)
–0.15 (–0.52 0.23)
– – –
0.17 (–0.14 0.47)
– – –
0.77 (0.40 – 1.15)
0.55 (0.25 – 0.86)
0.25 (–0.12 – 0.63)
–0.12 0.42 (–0.43 –
Length (1–5)
0.35 (–0.01 – 0.70)
0.01 (–0.28 – 0.29)
0.18 (–0.22 0.57)
0.14 (–0.18 0.46)
0.95 (0.56 – 1.35)
0.49 (0.17 – 0.81)
0.26 (–0.13 – 0.66)
–0.09 0.60 (–0.40 –
Width (1–5)
0.18 (–0.13 – 0.50)
0.03 (–0.23 – 0.28)
0.06 (–0.30 0.42)
0.24 (–0.05 0.53)
0.74 (0.39 – 1.10)
0.53 (0.25–0.82
–0.01 (–0.37 – 0.35)
0.24 0.11 (–0.05 –
Ear
Nose
Ear
Nose
Ear
Nose
Ear
Nose
0.76 Colour 1.31 0.79 –9.38 0.02
0.70
0.99
0.13
(0–100)
(–8.62 – 11.24)
(–16.98 – –1.78)
3.61 0.50 (–7.06 –
–2.05 0.62 (–10.22 –
(2.90 – 24.23)
(–5.17 – 11.16)
(–13.55 – 7.78)
–10.13 0.02 (–18.30 –
12.73 (4.49– 20.97)
<0.01
–0.98 (–7.29 – 5.33)
23.84 (14.73 – 32.96)
13.87 (6.89 – 20.85)
<0.01
6.99 (–2.12 – 16.11)
Layman
Patient
OMF surgeon
ENT surgeon
14.27)
6.12)
–1.97)
0.52)
* Difference was calculated by subtracting the score for the autologous reconstruction from the score of the prosthetic reconstruction, based on the mixed model analyses.
2.70)
7.65)
0.18)
0.23)