Page 168 - DECISION-MAKING IN SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY PATIENT OUTCOME, HOSPITAL COSTS, AND RESEARCH PRACTICE

Chapter 7
REFERENCES
1. Guide for Research Ethics Committee Members, Steering Comm. on Bioethics, revised version 3 December 2010, Council of Europe April (2012).
2. Emanuel E, Crouch R, Lie R, et al. The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Reprint edition 2011.
3. Standards and operational guidance for ethics review of health-related research with human participants, World Health Organization (2011).
4. Innovative Medicine Innitiative, IMI mission and objectives. https://www.imi.europa.eu/about-imi/mission- objectives. Accessed August 3, 2019.
5. European Commission, Horizon 2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. https://eur- lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0808&from=EN. Published 2011. Accessed September 3, 2019.
6. Tridente A, Holloway P, Hutton P, et al. Methodological challenges in European ethics approvals for a genetic epidemiology study in critically ill patients: the GenOSept experience. BMC Med Ethics 2019;20:30.
7. Urushihara H, Parmenter L, Tashiro S, et al. Bridge the gap: The need for harmonized regulatory and ethical standards for postmarketing observational studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:1299-1306.
8. Aledort L. Harmonization of clinical trial guidelines for assessing the risk of inhibitor development in hemophilia A treatment. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(3):423-427.
9. Oliver Daly J. Harmonisation of research outcomes for meaningful translation to practice: The role of Core Outcome Sets and the CROWN Initiative. Aust N Z J Obs Gynaecol. 2018;58:15-16.
10. Bowles K, Potashnik S, Ratcliffe S, et al. Conducting research using the electronic health record across multi- hospital systems: semantic harmonization implications for administrators. J Nurs Adm. 2013;43:355-360.
11. Maas A, Menon D, Steyerberg E, et al. Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): a prospective longitudinal observational study. Neurosurgery. 2015;76:67-80.
12. Steyerberg E, Wiegers E, Sewalt C, et al. Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study. The Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:923-934.
13. Maas A, Menon D, Adelson P, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:987-1048.
14. Cnossen M, Polinder S, Lingsma H, et al. Variation in structure and process of care in traumatic brain injury: Provider profiles of European Neurotrauma Centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161367.
15. ICON plc. http://www.iconplc.com. Accessed August 8, 2019.
16. United Nations, Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49). https://unstats.un.org/unsd/
methodology/m49/. Published 1999. Accessed September 5, 2019.
17. Mascette A, Bernard G, Dimichele D, et al. Are central institutional review boards the solution? The National Heart,
Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group’s report on optimizing the IRB process. Acad Med. 2012;87:1710-1714.
18. AdamsP,KaewkungwalJ,LimphattharacharoenC,etal.IsYourEthicsCommitteeEfficient?Using“IRBMetrics”as a Self-Assessment Tool for Continuous Improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University,
Thailand. PLoS ONE 2014;9(11):e113356.
19. Thiese M. Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. Biochem Med. 2014;24(2):199-210.
20. Ravina B, Deuel L, Siderowf A, et al. Local institutional review board (IRB) review of a multicenter trial: local costs
without local context. Ann Neurol. 2010;67(2):258-260.
21. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European
Union C 326/47, 26 October (2012).
22. Henshall C, Mardhani-Bayne L, Fronsdal KB, et al. Interactions between health technology assessment, coverage,
and regulatory processes: emerging issues, goals, and opportunities. Int J Technol Assess Heal Care. 2011;27(3):253-
260.
23. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection
of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General data Protection Regulation) Official journal of the European Union L 119/1, 4 May (2016)
24. European Commission. The European Union. What it is and what it does. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2018. doi:10.2775/665897
25. Timmers M, Van Veen E-B, Maas A, et al. Will the Eu Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 Inhibit Critical Care Research? Med Law Rev. 2019;27:59-78.
166