Page 148 - DECISION-MAKING IN SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY PATIENT OUTCOME, HOSPITAL COSTS, AND RESEARCH PRACTICE

Chapter 6
74. Fried TR, Zenoni M, Iannone L, et al. Assessment of surrogates’ knowledge of patients’ treatment goals and confidence in their ability to make surrogate treatment decisions. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179:267-268.
75. Fins JJ. Rights come to mind. Cambridge University Press; 1 edition (August 11,2015) 2015.
76. * Khan MW, Muehlschlegel S. Shared decision making in neurocritical care. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2018; 29:315-321. There is much debate on the use of shared-decision making in neurocritical care. The authors discuss the general use of shared decision-making and ways to improve this.
77. Honeybul S, Gillett GR, Ho KM, et al. Neurotrauma and the rule of rescue. J Med Ethics 2011; 37:707-710.
78. van Dijck J, Dijkman MD, Ophuis RH, et al. In-hospital costs after severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic
review and quality assessment. PLoS One 2019;14:e0216743.
79. Zorginstituut Nederland. Ziektelast in de praktijk - de theorie en praktijk van het berekenen van ziektelast bij pakketbeoordelingen. 2018. https://www.zorginstituutnederland.nl/binaries/zinl/documenten/ rapport/2018/05/07/ziektelast-in-de-praktijk/Ziektelast+in+de+praktijk_definitief.pdf. Accessed: May 17, 2019.
80. Wilson L, Stewart W, Dams-O’Connor K, et al. The chronic and evolving neurological consequences of traumatic brain injury. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16:813-825.
81. Vespa P. Traumatic brain injury is a longitudinal disease process. Curr OpinNeurol 2017; 30:563-564.
82. * Marklund N, Bellander BM, Godbolt A, et al. Treatments and rehabilitation in the acute and chronic state of traumatic brain injury. J Intern Med 2019. doi: 10.1111/joim.12900. Rehabilitation is essential in the care of a patient with (severe) traumatic brain injury. Improvement of coordinated interdisciplinary rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury patients is necessary. The authors highlight this need and describe new approaches in rehabilitation.
83. Ratan RR, Schiff ND. Protecting and repairing the brain: Central and peripheral strategies define the new rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Neurol 2018; 31:669-671.
84. ** Konigs M, Beurskens EA, Snoep L, et al. Effects of timing and intensity of neurorehabilitation on functional outcome after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99:1149-1159. This systematic review and meta-analysis states that early neurorehabilitation in trauma centers and more intensive neurorehabilitation in rehabilitation facilities promote functional recovery in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.
85. Graff HJ, Christensen U, Poulsen I, et al. Patient perspectives on navigating the field of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A qualitative thematic analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 40:926-934.
86. Douglas JM, Knox L, De Maio C, et al. Effectiveness of communication-specific coping intervention for adults with traumatic brain injury: Preliminary results. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2019; 29:73-91.
87. Semprini M, Laffranchi M, Sanguineti V, et al. Technological approaches for neurorehabilitation: From robotic devices to brain stimulation and beyond. Front Neurol 2018; 9:212.
88. ** Thibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, et al. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18:600-614. The therapeutic options for patients with disorders of consciousness are often considered to be scarce. New clinical data and new treatment options pose new possibilities for this specific patient subcategory and are described in this article.
89. Avesani R, Dambruoso F, Scandola M, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 492 patients in a vegetative state in 29 Italian rehabilitation units. What about outcome? Funct Neurol 2018; 33:97-103.
90. Kochanek PM, Jackson TC, Jha RM, et al. Paths to successful translation of new therapies for severe traumatic brain injury in the golden age of traumatic brain injury research: A pittsburgh vision. J Neurotrauma 2019. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6203.
91. Wang KK, Yang Z, Zhu T, et al. An update on diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for traumatic brain injury. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2018; 18:165-180.
92. * Rau CS, Kuo PJ, Chien PC, et al. Mortality prediction in patients with isolated moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning models. PLoS One2018; 13:e0207192. New developments in prognostication for moderate and severe traumatic brain injury include the use of machine learning models.
93. Hale AT, Stonko DP, Brown A, et al. Machine-learning analysis outperforms conventional statistical models and ct classification systems in predicting 6-month outcomes in pediatric patients sustaining traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus 2018;45:E
146