Page 50 - Quantitative Imaging of Small Tumours with Positron Emission Tomography

References 1. Hoekstra CJ, Paglianiti I, Hoekstra OS, et al. Monitoring response to therapy in cancer using [18F]- 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and positron emission tomography: an overview of different analytical 2 methods. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:731-743. 2. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50 Suppl 1:122S-150S. 3. Hoetjes NJ, van Velden FH, Hoekstra OS, et al. Partial volume correction strategies for quantitative FDG PET in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1679-1687. 4. Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:932- 945. 5. Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Phelps ME. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 1. Effect of object size. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979;3:299-308. 6. Geworski L, Knoop BO, de Cabrejas ML, Knapp WH, Munz DL. Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:161-169. 7. Erlandsson K, Buvat I, Pretorius PH, Thomas BA, Hutton BF. A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:R119-159. 8. Kuhnert G, Boellaard R, Sterzer S, et al. Impact of PET/CT image reconstruction methods and liver uptake normalization strategies on quantitative image analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:249-258. 9. Rousset O, Rahmim A, Alavi A, Zaidi H. Partial Volume Correction Strategies in PET. PET Clin. 2007;2:235-249. 10. Avril N, Dose J, Janicke F, et al. Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1848-1857. 11. Rousset OG, Ma Y, Evans AC. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:904-911. 12. Muller-Gartner HW, Links JM, Prince JL, et al. Measurement of radiotracer concentration in brain gray matter using positron emission tomography: MRI-based correction for partial volume effects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992;12:571-583. 13. Teo BK, Seo Y, Bacharach SL, et al. Partial-volume correction in PET: validation of an iterative postreconstruction method with phantom and patient data. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:802-810. 14. Tohka J, Reilhac A. Deconvolution-based partial volume correction in Raclopride-PET and Monte Carlo comparison to MR-based method. Neuroimage. 2008;39:1570-1584. 15. Gallivanone F, Canevari C, Gianolli L, et al. A partial volume effect correction tailored for 18F-FDG- PET oncological studies. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:780458. 16. Krempser AR, Ichinose RM, Miranda de Sa AM, Velasques de Oliveira SM, Carneiro MP. Recovery coefficients determination for partial volume effect correction in oncological PET/CT images considering the effect of activity outside the field of view. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27:924-930. 17. Rahmim A, Qi J, Sossi V. Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls. Med Phys. 2013;40:064301. 18. Wallsten E, Axelsson J, Sundstrom T, Riklund K, Larsson A. Subcentimeter tumor lesion delineation for high-resolution 18F-FDG PET images: optimizing correction for partial-volume effects. J Nucl Med Technol. 2013;41:85-91. 19. Boussion N, Cheze Le Rest C, Hatt M, Visvikis D. Incorporation of wavelet-based denoising in iterative deconvolution for partial volume correction in whole-body PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1064-1075. 20. Bhatt R, Adjouadi M, Goryawala M, Gulec SA, McGoron AJ. An algorithm for PET tumor volume and activity quantification: without specifying camera's point spread function (PSF). Med Phys. 2012;39:4187-4202. 21. Merlin T, Visvikis D, Fernandez P, Lamare F. A novel partial volume effects correction technique integrating deconvolution associated with denoising within an iterative PET image reconstruction. Med Phys. 2015;42:804-819. Accuracy and Precision of PVC 49