Page 77 - Shared Guideline Development Experiences in Fertility Care

Evaluation of Wiki System Quality
To evaluate the quality of the wiki system and to identify facilitators, barriers, and potential areas of improvement, we conducted an online questionnaire. To gain insight into the thoughts underlying the resulting factors that formed potential facilitators of or barriers to adoption of the wiki and aspects of improvement, we conducted in-depth interviews with wiki users who completed the evaluation questionnaire.
Online Evaluation Questionnaire
During the prioritization phase, patients visiting the wiki website were invited to
complete an online evaluation questionnaire. is questionnaire included items
regarding users’ background characteristics (e.g., age, type of infertility), use
of the wiki (e.g., number of visits), and factors that could potentially in uence
adoption of the wiki (quality of the wiki website, satisfaction, and net bene ts)
based on the relevant evaluation factors derived from the Human, Organization, 4 and Technology- t framework [32]. Questions on the potential in uencing
factors were grouped into 5 sections: ease of use of the wiki website, layout of the wiki website, value of the wiki methodology as a participatory tool for CPG development, content of the wiki website, and experienced privacy on the wiki website. Patients were asked to rate 22 accompanying positively formulated statements on these factors on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) (Multimedia Appendix 1). A er each section, patients were invited to comment. Next, patients were asked to describe their three advantages and disadvantages of the wiki website and potential areas of improvement. Finally, patients were asked for their willingness to participate again in a similar project and for their intention to recommend this wiki.
In-Depth Interviews with Wiki Users
We rst summarized the identi ed in uencing factors on adoption of the wiki website and suggested potential areas of improvement. Next, we translated these into a topic list to guide the in-depth interviews. To get both con rmation of and saturation in the thoughts underlying the facilitators of and barriers to adoption and potential areas of improvement of the wiki, 1 researcher (EB) conducted semistructured in-depth interviews with wiki users by telephone. Participants in the questionnaire survey who le their email address were randomly recruited by email. e rst part of the interview consisted of open-ended questions, related to
Wiki for patient participation
75