Page 66 - Shared Guideline Development Experiences in Fertility Care

Chapter 3
References
1. Halvorson GC. Health Care Reform Now!: A Prescription for Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2007.
2. Alston CPL, Halvorson G, Paget L et al.: Communicating With Patients on Health Care Evidence, Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2012.
3. Novelli WD, Halvorson GC, Santa J. Recognizing an opinion: ndings from the IOM evidence communication innovation collaborative. J Am Med Assoc 2012;308:1531–1532.
4. Smith M, Halvorson G, Kaplan G. What’s needed is a health care system that learns: recommendations from an IOM report. J Am Med Assoc 2012;308:1637–1638.
5. Landon BE, Grumbach K, Wallace PJ. Integrating public health and primary care systems: potential strategies from an IOM report. J Am Med Assoc 2012;308:461–462.
6. Wynia MK, Von Kohorn I, Mitchell PH. Challenges at the intersection of team-based and patient- centered health care: insights from an IOM working group. J Am Med Assoc 2012;308:1327–1328.
7. Burgers JS, Cluzeau FA, Hanna SE et al. Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:148–157.
8. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A et al. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000;355:103–106.
9. Institute Of Medicine (IOM). Clinical Practice Guidelines we can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2011.
10. Alonso-Coello P, Irfan A, Sola I et al. e quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:e58.
11. Kung J, Miller RR, Mackowiak PA. Failure of clinical practice guidelines to meet institute of medicine standards: two more decades of little, if any, progress. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:1628–33.
12. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. J Am Med Assoc 2009;301:868–9.
13. Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J et al. Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:239–249.
14. Goodwin NPG, Peck E, Freeman T et al. Managing Across Diverse Networks of Care: Lessons from Other Sectors, Report to the national co-ordinating centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO). NCCSDO, 2004. http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/ les/adhoc/39-policy-report.pdf, 12 August 2014, date last accessed.
15. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA et al. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment- seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1506–1512.
16. Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P et al. De nition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1144–1147.
17. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM). http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=4590, 12 August 2014, date last accessed.
18. den Breejen EM, Nelen WL, Knijnenburg JM et al. Feasibility of a wiki as a participatory tool for patients in clinical guideline development. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e138.
19. Hulscher ME, Laurant MG, Grol RP. Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:40–46.
20. Peters V, Wester F. How Qualitative Data Analysis So ware may Support the Qualitative Analysis Process. Quality & Quantity 2007;41:635 – 659.
21. Richie J, Spencer L. Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In: Analysing Qualitative Data. Edited by Bryman A, Burgess B. London: Routledge 1994;173–194.
22. Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Westbrook JI et al. Net bene ts: assessing the e ectiveness of clinical networks in Australia through qualitative methods. Implement Sci 2012;7:108.
23. Institute Of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21 st century. Washington, DC: IOM, 2001.
64