Page 41 - Shared Guideline Development Experiences in Fertility Care

References
1. e AGREE collaboration. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Collaboration. London; 2010. www.agreecollaboration.org.
2. Institute Of Medicine (IOM). Clinical Practice Guidelines we can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2011.
3. Institute Of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21 st century.
Washington, DC: IOM, 2001. 2
4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). e guidelines manual. London: NICE, 2012.
5. World Health Organisation (WHO). Guidelines for WHO Guidelines. Global programm on evidence for Health Policy. Geneva: WHO, 2003.
6. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:e22.
7. Leotsakos A, Zheng H, Croteau R et al. Standardization in patient safety: the WHO High 5s project. Int J Qual Health Care 2014;26:109-16.
8. Staniszewska S, Boardman F, Gunn L et al. e Warwick Patient Experiences Framework: patient- based evidence in clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 2014;26:151-7.
9. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). https://www.nice.org.uk/media/default/ About/NICE-Communities/Public-involvement/Public-involvement-programme/PIP-process- guide-apr-2015.pdf, 19 January 2016, date last accessed.
10. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) http://www.sign.ac.uk/patients/network.html, 19 January 2016, date last accessed.
11. G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in Guidelines. Guidelines International Network, 2015. http://www.g-i-n.net/document-store/working-groups-documents/g-i-n-public/ toolkit/toolkit-2015, 19 January 2016, date last accessed.
12. e Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW). e Participation Compass. http://www.participatiekompas.nl/over-participatiekompas/english, 19 January 2016, date last accessed.
13. Woolf S, Schunemann HJ, Eccles MP et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implement Sci 2012;7:61.
14. Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Shekelle P et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and con icts of interest. Implement Sci 2012;7:60.
15. Legare F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Med Decis Making 2011;31: E45-74.
16. Tong A, Lopez-Vargas P, Howell M et al. Consumer involvement in topic and outcome selection in the development of clinical practice guidelines. Health Expect 2012;15:410-23.
17. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C et al. Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health A airs 2001;20:64-78.
18. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. J Am Med Assoc 2002;288:2469-75.
19. Kennedy A, Rogers A, Bower P. Support for self care for patients with chronic disease. BMJ 2007;335:968-70.
20. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: e ective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003;362:1225-30.
21. Cooper AR, Baker VL, Sterling EW et al. e time is now for a new approach to primary ovarian insu ciency. Fertil and Steril 2011;95:1890-7.
22. van Empel IW, Aarts JW, Cohlen BJ et al. Measuring patient-centredness, the neglected outcome in fertility care: a random multicentre validation study. Hum Reprod 2010;25:2516-26.
Key clinical issues in fertility care
39