Page 140 - Shared Guideline Development Experiences in Fertility Care

Chapter 6
References
1. Min JK, Breheny SA, MacLachlan V et al. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? e singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2004;19:3-7.
2. Institute Of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
3. Dancet EA, Nelen WL, Sermeus W et al. e patients’ perspective on fertility care: a systematic review. Human reproduction update 2010;16:467-487.
4. Dancet EA, Van Empel IW, Rober P et al. Patient-centred infertility care: a qualitative study to listen to the patient’s voice. Hum Reprod 2011a;26:827-33.
5. Schmidt L, Holstein BE, Boivin J et al. A. High ratings of satisfaction with fertility treatment are common: ndings from the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) Research Programme. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2638-2846.
6. van Empel IW, Aarts JW, Cohlen BJ et al. Measuring patient-centredness, the neglected outcome in fertility care: a random multicentre validation study. Hum Reprod 2010;25:2516-2526.
7. van Empel IW, Hermens RP, Akkermans RP et al. Organizational determinants of patient-centered fertility care: a multilevel analysis. Fertil Steril 2011;95:513-519.
8. Gameiro S, Boivin J, Peronace L et al. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Human reproduction update, 2012;18:652-669.
9. Souter VL, Penney G, Hopton JL et al. A. Patient satisfaction with the management of infertility. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1831-1836.
10. Aarts JW, Faber MJ, van Empel IW et al. Professionals’ perceptions of their patients’ experiences with fertility care. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1119-27.
11. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A et al. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ 2003;326:816-19.
12. Grol R, Baker R, Moss F. Quality improvement research: understanding the science of change in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:110-111.
13. Institute Of Medicine (IOM). Clinical Practice Guidelines we can trust. 2011. National Academy Press, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2011.
14. Haagen EC, Nelen WL, Grol RP et al. Variation in guideline adherence in intrauterine insemination care. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;20:533-542.
15. Mourad SM, Hermens RP, Nelen WL et al. Guideline-based development of quality indicators for subfertility care. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2665-72.
16. van den Boogaard E, Goddijn M, Leschot NJ et al. Development of guideline-based quality indicators for recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;20:267-273.
17. Krahn, M, Naglie G. e next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. J Am Med Assoc 2008;300:436-38.
18. Kotter T, Blozik E, Scherer M. Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review. Implement Sci 2012;7:21.
19. Ouwens M, Hermens R, Hulscher M et al. Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care. Supportive Care in Cancer 2010;18:121-130.
20. Upho EP, Wennekes L, Punt CJ et al. Development of generic quality indicators for patient-centered cancer care by using a RAND modi ed Delphi method. Canc Nursing 2012;35:29-37.
21. den Breejen EM, Nelen WL, Knijnenburg JM et al. Feasibility of a wiki as a participatory tool for patients in clinical guideline development. J Med Intern Res 2012;14:e138.
22. Fitch K, Bernstein S, Aguilar M. e RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001.
23. Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M et al. Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 201;6:e20476.
138