Page 108 - Shared Guideline Development Experiences in Fertility Care
P. 108
Chapter 5
age, infertility duration, and total treatment duration) and the chi-square test (i.e. education level, primary/secondary infertility, childless, and type of treatment). All reported P values were two sided, with P<0.05 considered to be signi cant.
Results
Use of the tool
Actual Use
In 12 months, the specialized online participatory tool welcomed 3028 unique Dutch visitors. Of these visitors, 95 visitors completed a registry form. Of the registered participants, eight participated in the project and were therefore excluded. e remaining 87 registered participants included 12 men and 75 women. ose 3028 visitors viewed 11.658 pages and 649 (21%) of them visited the tool more than once. Visitors viewed on average 3.28 pages per visit. Overall, visitors spent a mean time of 2 minutes and 26 seconds on the tool, new visitors 1 minute and 36 seconds, and recurrent visitors 5 minutes and 36 seconds per visit. Of all visitors, 23% visited the tool directly. Other landing pages included the website of the previous basic wiki tool (50%), Google (13%), Twitter (13%), and other (1%).
Usability of the tool
Of the 87 registered participants, 45 (52%) indicated on the registry form that they were willing to participate in the SUS evaluation of the tool. Of these 45 potential participants for the evaluation that received the link to the questionnaire by email, 39 (87%) performed the SUS evaluation of the tool. e median overall score was 82.5, ranging from 70 to 90, corresponding with good usability for the tool.
Representativeness of users
Female active registered participants (n=75) of the specialized online participatory tool were representative regarding their age (P=0.39), type of infertility (i.e. primary/secondary) (P=0.31), and percentage of childlessness (P=0.71) compared to a valid hospital group. ey had a signi cantly longer duration of infertility and treatment period, were within a more advanced treatment phase, and were more highly educated than the hospital group (Table 1).
106
