Page 127 - The SpeakTeach method - Esther de Vrind
P. 127

                                                                                                                                                                                                  125
 5
J 1 2
1 5
022 123 021
7
Yes
The teacher had goals that corresponded to the goals of the innovation (procedures 1 and 2) and made steps in all procedures with which she was reasonably satisfied. She also had other goals. One of those could be achieved reasonably well within the context of the innovation, and the other less well.
K 1 2
1 4
022 133 100
25 No 3
0
 overall satisfied with the teaching method
Had goals that corresponded with the goals of the innovation (procedures 1 and 2), took steps for procedures 1 and 2 with which the teacher was a little bit satisfied, but procedure 3 did not succeed and so the teacher was not satisfied with this at all.
The teacher also had other goals, which apparently could be realized to some extent within the context of the innovation, because the teacher was partially satisfied with these goals.
3 2 5-6 O 2 2-5
3 1 1 O 2 3-6
125
both the objectives of the innovation and other objectives were achieved within the context of the innovation, to the teacher’s satisfaction; however, the teacher indicated in the explanatory note that she would probably only apply parts of the teaching approach.
The teacher had goals with regard to the innovation but the procedure for providing adaptive feedback seemed to be inapplicable. Satisfaction was therefore low. The teacher still considered it possible to use parts of the teaching approach in the future. However, the teacher indicated that he had not used the SpeakTeach method in the following school year.














































































   125   126   127   128   129