Page 136 - Clinical relevance of current materials for cranial implants

134
Chapter 6
REFERENCES
1. Malcolm, J. G. et al. Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Neurosci. 33, 39–51 (2016).
2. Hutchinson, P. J. et al. Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 1119–1130 (2016).
3. Morton, R. P. et al. Predictors of infection after 754 cranioplasty operations and the value of intraoperative cultures for cryopreserved bone flaps. J. Neurosurg. 125, 766–770 (2016).
4. Corliss, B. et al. Complications After In Vivo and Ex Vivo Autologous Bone Flap Storage for Cranioplasty: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 96, 510–515 (2016).
5. Rohner, D., Guijarro-Mart??nez, R., Bucher, P. & Hammer, B. Importance of patient-specific intraoperative guides in complex maxillofacial reconstruction. J. Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg. 41, 382–390 (2013).
6. Guerrini, F. et al. It Is Time to Reduce Free-Hand Manipulation: Case Report of Our Proposal for an Innovative 1-Step Cranioplasty. World Neurosurg. 107, 1052.e7-1052.e10 (2017).
7. Abdel Hay, J., Smayra, T. & Moussa, R. Customized Polymethylmethacrylate Cranioplasty Implants Using 3-Dimensional Printed Polylactic Acid Molds: Technical Note with 2 Illustrative Cases. World Neurosurg. 105, 971–979.e1 (2017).
8. Broeckx, C. E., Maal, T. J. J., Vreeken, R. D., Bos, R. R. M. & ter Laan, M. Single-Step Resection of an Intraosseous Meningioma and Cranial Reconstruction: Technical Note. World Neurosurg. 108, 225–229 (2017).
9. Jonkergouw, J. et al. Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: A two-center cohort study of 40 implants. J. Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg. 44, 1266–1272 (2016).
10. Sasuga, T. & Hagiwara, M. Radiation deterioration of several aromatic polymers under oxidative conditions. Polymer (Guildf). 28, 1915–1921 (1987).
11. Stober, E. J., Seferis, J. C. & Keenan, J. D. Characterization and exposure of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to fluid environments. Polymer (Guildf). 25, 1845–1852 (1984).
12. Boinard, E., Pethrick, R. A. & MacFarlane, C. J. The influence of thermal history on the dynamic mechanical and dielectric studies of polyetheretherketone exposed to water and brine. Polymer (Guildf). 41, 1063–1076 (2000).
13. Godara, A., Raabe, D. & Green, S. The influence of sterilization processes on the micromechanical properties of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK composites for bone implant applications. Acta Biomater. 3, 209–220 (2007).
14. Steinberg, E. L. et al. Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK Optima—A composite material biomechanical properties and wear/debris characteristics of CF-PEEK composites for orthopedic trauma implants. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 17, 221–228 (2013).
15. Kurtz, S. M. in PEEK Biomaterials Handbook 1–7 (Elsevier, 2012).
16. Toth, J. M. et al. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 27, 324–334
(2006).
17. Kim, M. M., Boahene, K. D. O. & Byrne, P. J. Use of customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in the
reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 11, 53–57 (2009).
18. van de Vijfeijken, S. E. C. M. et al. Autologous bone is inferior to alloplastic cranioplasties Safety of autograft
and allograft materials for cranioplasties, a systematic review. World Neurosurg. (2018).
19. Lethaus, B. et al. Patient-specific implants compared with stored bone grafts for patients with interval
cranioplasty. J. Craniofac. Surg. 25, 206–209 (2014).
20. Carolus, A., Weihe, S., Schmieder, K. & Brenke, C. One-step CAD/CAM titanium cranioplasty after drilling template-assisted resection of intraosseous skull base meningioma: technical note. Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 159, 447–452 (2017).
21. Ng, V. Y., DeClaire, J. H., Berend, K. R., Gulick, B. C. & Lombardi, A. V. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 470, 99–107 (2012).
22. Coppen, C., Weijs, W., Bergé, S. J. & Maal, T. J. J. Oromandibular reconstruction using 3D planned triple template method. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 71, 243–247 (2013).
23. Schreurs, R., Dubois, L., Becking, A. G. & Maal, T. J. J. The orbit first! A novel surgical treatment protocol for secondary orbitozygomatic reconstruction. J. Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg. 45, 1043–1050 (2017).