Page 27 - Cellular Imaging in Regenerative Medicine, Cancer and Osteoarthritis

67. Sutton EJ, Henning TD, Pichler BJ, Bremer C, Daldrup-Link HE. Cell tracking with optical imaging. European Radiology. 2008;18(10):2021-32.
68. Srivastava AK, Bulte JWM. Seeing Stem Cells at Work In Vivo. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2014;10(1):127-44.
69. Aarntzen EHJG, Srinivas M, Radu CG, Punt CJA, Boerman OC, Figdor CG, et al. In vivo imaging of therapy-induced anti-cancer immune responses in humans. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(13):2237-57.
70. de Jong M, Essers J, van Weerden WM. Imaging preclinical tumour models: improving translational power. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(7):481-93.
71. Bernsen MR, Moelker AD, Wielopolski PA, van Tiel ST, Krestin GP. Labelling of mammalian cells for visualisation by MRI. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(2):255-74.
72. Berger A. Magnetic resonance imaging. BMJ. 2002;324(7328):35.
73. Modo M. Molecular and Cellular MR imaging2007.
74. Fenster A, Downey DB. T HREE -D IMENSIONAL U LTRASOUND I MAGING. 2000;2(1):457-75.
75. Wells PN. Ultrasound imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(13):R83-98.
76. Lentacker I, De Cock I, Deckers R, De Smedt SC, Moonen CT. Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:49-64.
77. Kooiman K, Vos HJ, Versluis M, de Jong N. Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:28-48.
78. Wirrwar A, Schramm N, Vosberg H, Muller-Gartner HW. High resolution SPECT in small animal research. Rev Neurosci. 2001;12(2):187-93.
79. Wu M, Shu J. Multimodal Molecular Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging. 2018;2018:1-12.
80. Bernsen MR, Ruggiero A, Van Straten M, Kotek G, Haeck JC, Wielopolski PA, et al. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 3-63.
81. Bernsen MR, Vaissier PEB, Van Holen R, Booij J, Beekman FJ, De Jong M. The role of preclinical SPECT in oncological and neurological research in combination with either CT or MRI. 2014;41(S1):36-49.
82. Meikle SR, Kench P, Kassiou M, Banati RB. Small animal SPECT and its place in the matrix of molecular imaging technologies. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(22):R45-61.
83. Beekman F, Van Der Have F. The pinhole: gateway to ultra-high-resolution three-dimensional radionuclide imaging. 2007;34(2):151-61.
84. Kupinski MA. Small-animal SPECT imaging.
85. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography. Mathematics and physics of emerging biomedical imaging: National Academies Press (US); 1996. p. 89-104.
86. Islamian JP, Azazrm A, Mahmoudian B, Gharapapagh E. Advances in pinhole and multi-pinhole collimators for single photon emission computed tomography imaging. World J Nucl Med. 2015;14(1):3-9.
87. Dendy PP HB. Physics for diagnostic radiology2011.
88. Massoud TF, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light. Genes Dev. 2003;17(5):545-80.
89. James ML, Gambhir SS. A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(2):897-965.
Introduction
25
1