Page 65 - Timeliness of Infectious Disease Notification & Response Systems - Corien Swaan

Timeliness of notification systems: a systematic literature review 63
3
Study number, author,
year country
Disease(s), Disease specific system +/ -
Study* Level of Method of reporting** reporting***
Reporting Delay described #
Predefined timeframe
Timely according predefined timeframe? S-P-I ##
Timely according standardized timeframe? S-P-I ##
8. Garcell et al. 2014, Qatar 25
Several ID Influenza (+)
I Level 1 Mandatory
C: Telephone or Fax
D1, D3P D3P/ D3X
D3P: notification de- lay: Group1: 24h Group2: 72h
D3P: G1: I G2: S
D3P: G1: I G2: S
9. Ghosh et al. 2008, US, Colorado 26
E Level 1 Mandatory
E ‘CERDS’ and C: Fax (passive), tele- phone (active)
Not available
Comparative study
10. Goto et al. 2016, Brazil 27
Dengue (-)
E Level 1, Mandatory
E ‘SINAN’, online computerized noti- fication system
D1
D3P, D3X
D1 Study: ≤ 7 days
D1: S
D1: S
11. Grills et al. 2010, Australia 28
Campylobacter (-)
E Level 1 Mandatory
C: Post (mainly lab), fax (mainly MD), telephone (little).
D3P/X Notification ≤ 5 days
D3P: S D3X: P
3DP: P D3X: I
12. Haller et al. 2014, Germany 29
Healthcare as- sociated outbreaks (+)
E Level 2,3 Mandatory
C: fax, e-mail
D4-5 D3P D3P
D4:Within 3 working days D5: ≤ 1 week
D4: S, D5: S
D4: I, D5: I
13. Heisey-Grove et al. 2011, US, Massachusetts 30
Hepatitis C (+) Several ID
I Level 1 Voluntary
C (paper) -> E: (electronic report- ing forms)
Not available
Comparative study
14. Huaman et al. 2009, Peru 31
E Level 1 Voluntary
C:Telephone, ra- dio, E: electronic surveillance sys- tem
Immediately after detection/ mandatory twice a week.
D3P clinics: S, ships: P
D3P: P
and Voluntary
Notification system