Page 216 - Timeliness of Infectious Disease Notification & Response Systems - Corien Swaan
P. 216

214 Chapter 9
14. Reijn E, Swaan CM, Kretzschmar ME, van Steenbergen JE. Analysis of timeliness of infectious disease reporting in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:409.
15. Moore KM, Reddy V, Kapell D, Balter S. Impact of electronic laboratory report- ing on hepatitis A surveillance in New York City. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(5):437-41.
16. Kite-Powell A. HJ, Hopkins RS., DePasquale JM., . Potential Effects of Electronic Lab- oratory Reporting on Improving Timeliness of Infectious Disease Notification - Flor- ida, 2002-2006. CDC MMWR. 2008;57(49):1325-8.
17. Crabbe H, Saavedra-Campos M, Verlander NQ, Leonard A, Morris J, Wright A, et al. Are pertussis cases reported too late for public health interventions? Retrospective analysis of cases in London and South East England, 2010 to 2015. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(29).
18. Heil J, Ter Waarbeek HLG, Hoebe C, Jacobs PHA, van Dam DW, Trienekens TAM, et al. Pertussis surveillance and control: exploring variations and delays in testing, laboratory diagnostics and public health service notifications, the Netherlands, 2010 to 2013. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(28).
19. Severi E, Dabrera G, Boxall N, Harvey-Vince L, Booth L, Balasegaram S. Timeliness of Electronic Reporting and Acceptability of Public Health Follow-Up of Routine Nonparatyphoidal and Nontyphoidal Salmonella Infections, London and South East England, 2010 to 2011. Journal of Food Protection®. 2014;77(1):94-9.
20. Day F, Sutton G. General practitioner notifications of gastroenteritis and food poi- soning: cause for concern. Journal of public health. 2007;29(3):288-91.
21. Grills NJ, Rowe SL, Gregory JE, Lester RA, Fielding JE. Evaluation of’Campylo- bacter’Infection Surveillance in Victoria. 2010.
22. Rietveld A, Schneeberger PM, Wijkmans CJ. [More and faster notification of infec- tious disease if notification is carried out by the laboratories instead of the diag- nosing physician]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005;149(6):304-7.
23. Overhage JM, Grannis S, McDonald CJ. A comparison of the completeness and timeliness of automated electronic laboratory reporting and spontaneous report- ing of notifiable conditions. American journal of public health. 2008;98(2):344.
24. Jansson A, Arneborn M, Skärlund K, Ekdahl K. Timeliness of case reporting in the Swedish statutory surveillance of communicable diseases 1998-2002. Scandina- vian journal of infectious diseases. 2004;36(11-12):865-72.
25. Tariq A, Roosa K, Mizumoto K, Chowell G. Assessing reporting delays and the ef- fective reproduction number: The Ebola epidemic in DRC, May 2018-January 2019. Epidemics. 2019;26:128-33.






















































































   214   215   216   217   218