Page 81 - Imaging of Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis in Hand Joints

Accuracy of cartilage MRI of CMC1; comparison with histology
21. McGibbon CA, Trahan CA. Measurement accuracy of focal cartilage defects from MRI and correlation of MRI graded lesions with histology: a preliminary study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003; 11(7):483-93.
22. Kladny B, Martus P, Schiwy-Bochat KH, et al. Measurement of cartilage thickness in the human knee-joint by magnetic resonance imaging using a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence. Int Orthop. 1999; 23(5):264-7.
23. Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Hargreaves BA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20(5):857-64.
24. Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hyhlik-Durr A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 44(9):2072-7.
25. Frobell RB, Wirth W, Nevitt M, et al. Presence, location, type and size of denuded areas of subchondral bone in the knee as a function of radiographic stage of OA - data from the OA initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18(5):668-76.
26. Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Genovese M, et al. Articular Cartilage of Knee: Normal Patterns at MR Imaging That Mimic Disease in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Osteoarthritis. Radiology. 2004; 231(1):31-38.
27. Kwok WE, You Z, Monu J, et al. High-resolution uniform MR imaging of finger joints using a 4 dedicated RF coil at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31(1):240-7.
28. Siepmann DB, McGovern J, Brittain JH, et al. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189(6):1510-5.
29. Friedrich KM, Reiter G, Kaiser B, et al. High-resolution cartilage imaging of the knee at 3T: Basic evaluation of modern isotropic 3D MR-sequences. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 78(3):398-405.
79