Page 95 - Open versus closed Mandibular condyle fractures

Open treatment of condylar fractures: extraoral approaches
101
32
Table 3b. Surgical complications associated with the open treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures
Baek Benech Bhutia Biglioli Biglioli Bindra Bouchard Chossegros Colletti Croce
None None None
2 (8%)
2 (5.3%) None
14 (11.9%) 1 (5.2%)
NCD None ND ND ND ND ND ND ND None ND ND
ND None ND ND ND ND
1 (5.3%) None
3 (6.8%) ND
Not disturbing
Not disturbing
Not disturbing
2 (8%) unsatisfactory 2 (5.3%) unsatisfactory Not disturbing
ND None ND
ND
ND None
1 (0.9%) ND
None None ND ND ND ND ND
Dalla Torre Downie Dunaway Ebenezer Girotto Hou Kanno Kim
Not disturbing
Klatt Kumaran
ND
Wound infection
Hematoma formation
Sialocele
Salivary fistula
Scar
Frey syndrome
Auricular anesthesia
3 (3%) ND ND
1 (2%) ND None None None None None None ND
2 (2%) unsatisfactory
ND
1 (5.6%) ND
ND
ND None ND
ND None ND
ND
ND
1 (3.4%) ND
ND
ND
Not disturbing
ND ND None ND
Not disturbing
LiNoneNDNDNDND
NoneND
Manisali Nam Narayanan Narayanan
1 (4%) ND 2 (8%) unsatisfactory ND NDNDND ND
2 (8%) transient ND
ND
ND
2 (1.7%)
ND
1 (1%) (trans) None
7 (6.8%)
1 (2%)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1 (2.9%) (retro)
ND
None
4 (3.4%)
ND
ND
4 (22.2%)
None
1 (2%)
ND
3 (15%) (trans)
None
3 (4.2%) (1 min, 2 ret) 1 (5.3%)
3 (10.7%)
2 (4%)
ND
ND
ND ND
ND ND
2 (5.7%) ND ND 4 (11.4%) 2 (5.7%) unsatisfactory None
1 (0.7%) ND
None None ND None
2 (11%) unsatisfactory
2 (10.5%) transient ND
ND
ND
Not disturbing
ND
ND ND ND None ND ND
4 (20%) unsatisfactory
Not disturbing
ND
Not disturbing
1 (3.57%) transient
5 (16%) lasting > 6 months ND
Disturbing (pre-auricular group, n=12))