Page 140 - Exploring the Potential of Self-Monitoring Kidney Function After Transplantation - Céline van Lint
P. 140

 138
Chapter 6
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristicsa
Received devices
  Sex, male (%)
Age at tx, M (SD)
Living together/married (%) Children, yes (%) Educational level (%)
- Low
- Middle - High
Paid job, yes (%)
Origin, native (%)
Former transplantation (%) Dialysis dependence pre-transplantation (%)
Living transplantation (%) Kidney function (eGFR), M (SD)
N=58 37 (64) 51.6 (14) 43 (74) 39 (67)
22 (38) 16 (28) 20 (34) 31 (53) 53 (91) 6 (10.3) 26 (44.8)
50 (86.2)
49 (16.1)
Used devices and SMSS p during all phases
N=43
27 (63) NSb
52.5 (15) NS 33 (77) NS 29 (67) NS
NS
14 (33)
12 (28)
17 (39)
23 (53) NS 41 (95) NS
4 (9.3) NS 21 (49) NS
38 (89) NS
50 (15) NS missing. This data was imputed in SPSS using multiple
  aFor a few patients data on marital status and education was imputation (10 imputations). b NS = not significant ( p=>.05).
  




































































   138   139   140   141   142