Page 141 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 141
Their second, related objection is stated as follows: “Even if the extended A/C model’s account of the formation of Christian belief were inconsistent with an important implication of Christian belief.” this “entails the claim that the Holy Spirit performs this activity as a part of the person’s cognitive system and so as a part of the person herself.”
My response is that Plantinga’s way of speaking about the work of the Holy Spirit compatible with Plantinga’s description in his (extended) A/C model.
“Plantinga’s model fails to that, and how, Christian belief ‘can perfectly well have warrant ’” As I have indicated
de jure de facto e Christian faith. They summarise a lengthy argument as follows: “In short, whether truth and is therefore probably false.”
139
Miscellaneous Theological Responses
8
