Page 101 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 101

Theological Responses to Plantinga’s A/C Model – Keith Mascord
                                                  
                6               
  basic and Plantinga’s example would not be valid. But if there is an already
             
                 basic theistic belief. Mascord seems to have misunderstood Plantinga’s examples.                                                                                 
                                                              
                              
In case of belief 2, Mascord suggests that “Various beliefs about God and about the                action.”                                                                    
               without argument, is conceivable. He suggests that it is “the most complicated, and, in many ways, the most important. It is also Plantinga’s best candidate for basicality.”
                 in an inferential argument. He suggests that “if a person already believes in God they are                        t of speaking to people through the Scriptures.”  concludes: “The implication of this is that other beliefs a person has, even if they do not
              
99
 





















































































   99   100   101   102   103