Page 235 - Balancing between the present and the past
P. 235

                                Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. M. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Virja, A., & Kouki, E. (2014). Dimensions of historical empathy in upper secondary students’ essays. Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 2, 137-160.
Virta, A. (2002). Becoming a history teacher: Observations on the beliefs and growth of student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 687-698.
Virta, A. (2007). Historical literacy: Thinking, reading and understanding history. Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 14(4), 11-25.
Von Borries, B. (1994). (Re-)Constructing history and moral judgment: On relationships between interpretations of the past and perceptions of the present. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 285–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
W
Wansink, B. G. J., Akkerman, S. F., & Wubbels, T. (2016). The certainty paradox of student history teachers: Balancing between historical facts and interpretation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 94-105. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.005
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655-684. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00304
Wils, K., & Verschaffel, T. (2012). Longing for the present in the history of history education. Paedagogica Historica, 48, 793-799. doi:10.1080/00309230.2012.739182
Wilschut, A. H. J. (2012). Images of time: The role of a historical consciousness of time in learning history. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73-87. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
Wineburg, S. S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319–346. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Wineburg, S. S., & Fournier, J. (1994). Contextualized thinking in history. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 285–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Witte, T. C. H. (2008). Het oog van de meester. Een onderzoek naar de literaire ontwikkeling van havo- en vwo-leerlingen in de tweede fase van het voortgezet onderwijs [The eye of the master: A study of students’ literary development in upper secondary education]. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
Wooden, J. A. (2008). ‘I had always heard Lincoln was a good person, but..’ A study of sixth graders’ reading of Lincoln’s views on black-white relations. The Social Studies, 99, 23-31. doi:10.3200/TSSS.99.1.23-32
Wragg, T. (1994). An introduction to classroom observation. New York, NY: Routledge. Y
Yeager, E. A., & Foster, S. J. (2001). The role of empathy in the development of historical understanding. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 21–50). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Yilmaz, K. (2007). Historical empathy and its implications for classroom practices in schools. The History Teacher, 40, 331-337.
Yoder, P. J., & Symons, F. J. (2010). Observational Measurement of Behavior. New York, NY: Springer.
R 233
References
 












































































   233   234   235   236   237