Page 133 - Impact of implant retained overdenture treatment and speech, oromyofunction, social participation and quality of life.

Personality, social participation and OHRQoL in dental implant treatment
21. Iveniuk J. Social Networks, Role-Relationships, and Personality in Older Adulthood. Journals
Gerontol Ser B-Psychological Sci Soc Sci. 2019;74(5):815-826. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx120
22. Takeshita H, Ikebe K, Kagawa R, et al. Association of personality traits with oral health-related quality of life independently of objective oral health status: a study of community-dwelling elderly Japanese. J Dent. 2015;43(3):342-349. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.011
23. Vieira RA, Melo AC, Budel LA, Gama JC, de Mattias Sartori IA, Thome G. Benefits of rehabilitation with implants in masticatory function: is patient perception of change in accordance with the real improvement? J Oral Implantol. 2014;40(3):263-269. doi:10.1563/aaid-joi-d-11-00208
24. Al-Omiri MK, Lamey PJ, Clifford T. Impact of tooth wear on daily living. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(6):601-605.
25. Al-Omiri MK, Sghaireen MG, Al-Qudah AA, Hammad OA, Lynch CD, Lynch E. Relationship between impacts of removable prosthodontic rehabilitation on daily living, satisfaction and personality profiles. J Dent. 2014;42(3):366-372. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.010
26. Ra’ed Omar AH, Mahmoud Khalid A-O, Ahed Mahmoud A-W. Psychological impact on implant patients’ oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(2):116-123. doi:10.1111/ j.1600-0501.2005.01219.x
27. Özhayat EB. Influence of negative affectivity and self-esteem on the oral health related quality of life in patients receiving oral rehabilitation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):178. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-178
28. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Social impact of oral conditions among older adults. Aust Dent J. 1994;39(6):358-364. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1994.tb03106.x
29. TORRES BLM, COSTA FO, MODENA CM, COTA LOM, CÔRTES MIS, SERAIDARIAN PI. Association between personality traits and quality of life in patients treated with conventional mandibular dentures or implant-supported overdentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(6):454-461. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2842.2010.02165.x
30. Hoekstra H, Ormel J, De Fruyt F. Handleiding NEO Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten NEO-PI_R En NEO- FFI. Swets Test Services; 1996.
31. van der Meulen M, John M, Naeije M, Lobbezoo F. The Dutch version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-NL): Translation, reliability and construct validity. BMC Oral Health. 2008;8:11. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-11
32. Mars GMJ, Kempen GIJM, Post MWM, Proot IM, Mesters I, van Eijk JTM. The Maastricht social participation profile: development and clinimetric properties in older adults with a chronic physical illness. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(9):1207. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9537-4
33. Plouffe RA, Paunonen S V, Saklofske DH. Item properties and the convergent validity of personality assessment: A peer rating study. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;111:96-105. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.051
34. Zani SR, Rivaldo EG, Frasca LCF, Caye LF. Oral health impact profile and prosthetic condition in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses. J Oral Sci. Published online 2009. doi:10.2334/josnusd.51.535
5
131