Page 76 - Peri-implant health: the effect of implant design and surgical procedure on bone and soft tissue stability

CHAPTER 4
Table 3: Overview of finally included papers with study design
Author
Treatment subgroups
Mean follow-up years
Patients at baseline
Implants at baseline
Implants at follow-up
Becker et al.113
Imburgia & Del Fabbro114 Hoeksema et al.115
Vandeweghe et al.116 Vandeweghe et al.117
Nedir et al.118 Park et al.119
Eerdekens et al.120 Perrotti et al.121
Romanos et al.122
Zhao et al.123 Crespi et al.124
van Velzen et al. 125
Trullenque-Eriksson & Guisado-Moya126
Joda et al.127 Meijer et al.128 Slotte et al.129 Schropp et al.130 Gholami et al.131
Cooper et al.132 Vervaeke et al.133 Mangano et al.134 Simion et al.135 Tealdo et al.136
Covani et al.137 Cooper et al.138
Leventi et al.139 Meyle et al.140 Pozzi et al.141 Anitua et al.142
2016 P 2015 R 2016 P
2016a R 2016b R
2016 P 2015 R
2015 P 2015 P
2014 P
2016 R 2014 P
2015 P 2014 R
2015 R 2014 P 2015 P 2014 P 2014 P
2014a P 2016 P 2015 R 2015 R 2014 P
2014 P 2014b P
2014 R 2014 P 2014 R 2014 R
6.5 31 84 40
74
Year
Study design
1: 2:
1: 2:
1: 2: 1:
2:
1:
8.8 41 older patients 10
young patients 10 105 7.5 46
moderately 14.3 rough
smooth 14.3 33 10 17 10 74
5 10 tuberplant 10 97
bioplant 10
immediate 10.1 12 loading
delayed loading 10.4
6.2 45
screw retained 8 28
205 205 106 64 104 99 211 211 121 121
76 76
25 23 242 242
60 10 67 67 59 59 30 30
30 30
45 45 136 136 136 136
2:cement 8 retained
1: 2:
1: 2:
1:
partial cases full cases
10 250 506 367 13.19 105 342 342
5 98 316 316 10 150 240 240 5 32 86 71 10 72 63 47 5 20 35 23 5 23 35 5 19 23 18 9 50 320 245 20 49 178 178 12 29 59 59
immediate 6.2 49 loading
delayed loading 6.2
5 47
immediate 5 113 placement
163 159
97 90 47 45 55 55
2:delayed 5 58 58 placement
7.7 41
10 20 8.82 73 10.3 75
102 102 54 54 167 160 111 87