Page 116 - Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Adhesions- New insights in prevention and consequences

Chapter 6
References
1. Israelsson, L.A. and T. Jonsson, Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study. Eur J Surg, 1996. 162(2): p. 125-9.
2. Read, R.C. and G. Yoder, Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg, 1989. 124(4): p. 485-8.
3. Bevis, P.M., et al., Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus sutured wound closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg, 2010. 97(10): p. 1497-502.
4. Hoer, J., et al., [Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years]. Chirurg, 2002. 73(5): p. 474- 80.
5. Burger, J.W., et al., Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg, 2004. 240(4): p. 578-83; discussion 583-5.
6. Luijendijk, R.W., et al., A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med, 2000. 343(6): p. 392-8.
7. Sajid, M.S., et al., Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta- analysis. Am J Surg, 2009. 197(1): p. 64-72.
8. Olmi, S., et al., Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc, 2007. 21(4): p. 555-9.
9. Sauerland, S., et al., Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011(3): p. CD007781.
10. Luijendijk, R.W., et al., Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Ann Surg, 1996. 223(3): p. 242-8.
11. Ellis, H., et al., Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 1999. 353(9163): p. 1476-80.
12. Stanciu, D. and D. Menzies, The magnitude of adhesion-related problems. Colorectal Dis, 2007. 9 Suppl 2: p. 35-8.
13. Leber, G.E., et al., Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg, 1998. 133(4): p. 378-82.
14. Burger, J.W., et al., Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc, 2006. 20(8): p. 1320-5.
15. Halm, J.A., et al., Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh hernia repair complicates subsequent abdominal surgery. World J Surg, 2007. 31(2): p. 423-9; discussion 430.
16. Kingsnorth, A. and K. LeBlanc, Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet, 2003. 362(9395): p. 1561-71.
17. Gaertner, W.B., M.E. Bonsack, and J.P. Delaney, Visceral adhesions to hernia prostheses. Hernia. 14(4): p. 375-81.
18. Breuing, K., et al., Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 148(3): p. 544-58.
19. Bellows, C.F., A. Alder, and W.S. Helton, Abdominal wall reconstruction using biological tissue grafts: present status and future opportunities. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2006. 3(5): p. 657-75.
20. Melman, L., et al., Early biocompatibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 15(2): p. 157-64.
21. Duan, X. and H. Sheardown, Crosslinking of collagen with dendrimers. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2005. 75(3): p. 510-8.
22. Alponat, A., et al., Prevention of adhesions by Seprafilm, an absorbable adhesion barrier: an incisional hernia model in rats. Am Surg, 1997. 63(9): p. 818-9.
23. Coleman, R., Picrosirius red staining revisited. Acta Histochemica, 2009. 111(5): p. 393- 470.
114