Page 69 - The efficacy and effectiveness of psychological treatments for eating disorders - Elske van den Berg
P. 69

  Chapter 3 69
 TABLE 4
Eating disorder treatment costs per cost category and differences in costs between 2012-2014 and 2015-2017 samples
Cost-effectiveness
Figure 2 shows the cost-effectiveness plane and the CEAC. After calculating the distribution of ICERs over four quadrants, there is a 71% likelihood that CBT-E domi- nates TAU and leads to more remissions at lower eating disorder treatment costs per patient. The likelihood that CBT-E leads to less remissions at lower costs is 29%. The likelihood that TAU leads to lower treatment costs is 0%. Based on the CEAC, assum- ing a WTP no extra direct treatment costs for extra remissions, there is probably a preference in terms of cost-effectiveness for CBT-E.
FIGURE 2
Cost effectiveness plane and cost effectiveness acceptability curve of the base case scenario with eating disorder remission as effect parameter (with inpatient and day care setting)
                      



























































































   67   68   69   70   71