Page 69 - The efficacy and effectiveness of psychological treatments for eating disorders - Elske van den Berg
P. 69
Chapter 3 69
TABLE 4
Eating disorder treatment costs per cost category and differences in costs between 2012-2014 and 2015-2017 samples
Cost-effectiveness
Figure 2 shows the cost-effectiveness plane and the CEAC. After calculating the distribution of ICERs over four quadrants, there is a 71% likelihood that CBT-E domi- nates TAU and leads to more remissions at lower eating disorder treatment costs per patient. The likelihood that CBT-E leads to less remissions at lower costs is 29%. The likelihood that TAU leads to lower treatment costs is 0%. Based on the CEAC, assum- ing a WTP no extra direct treatment costs for extra remissions, there is probably a preference in terms of cost-effectiveness for CBT-E.
FIGURE 2
Cost effectiveness plane and cost effectiveness acceptability curve of the base case scenario with eating disorder remission as effect parameter (with inpatient and day care setting)